Sunday, March 14, 2010

Should Women Keep Silent in Church?

It is easy to take things people say right to your face out of context. It is even easier to miss the full meaning of a message that is written down or emailed to you. Consider then how easy it would be to misinterpret a conversation meant for someone else when you overhear only one half of the discussion. Add that to the difficulty of the conversation being in a foreign language that you don’t know and you are really going to have to work hard to come up with the correct translation. Finally consider that the conversation took place over 2000 years ago in a culture that has dramatically changed, with religious practices no longer in place, and dealing with issues that may be outside of our current cultural practices. Welcome to the difficulties of Bible interpretation.

Though it may be nice to simply crack open the pages of an English version of the Bible, presented in modern language by a publishing company, and read it as though we were the intended audience, it is rather naïve. Good Bible study means hard work. It includes understanding as much as we can about the author, the initial audience, the setting, the culture, the conversation, the relationships, and the issues before we can really make much sense of the meaning. Then we can carefully ask ourselves about the timeless principles involved and evaluate how they relate to us in our lives. Finally, we have the choice to apply them. This is all hard work, yet worth all the effort.

Some passages of scripture are harder to understand than others. I remember a few things that my college professor taught me about biblical interpretation, one was that the Bible doesn’t disagree with itself, so if it appears that it does our study isn’t complete. We need to dig deeper and use good Bible study methods to help find the intended meaning. One of the best tools is to let the passages we believe to be clear help us interpret the ones that appear to reside in shadows.

A passage that has inspired much debate and division through the years is 1st Timothy 2:11-12 (NIV) “A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent.” A simple read of this English text would prompt a Bible-believing Christian to impose sanctions on the female gender when it came to speaking and teaching in a church meeting—a decision that many denominations and localized groups of believers have done. A more careful examination of this passage, in its original context, may put the desired meaning from the Apostle Paul to Timothy in a different light. And if that is the case, we may need to reconsider how we have applied what we have thought to be timeless truths through the years.

Jon Zens is a diligent student of the Bible and has done an impressive amount of homework regarding the historical context of this passage. In his book, What’s With Paul and Women: Unlocking the Cultural Background to 1 Timothy 2, he addresses the cultural misunderstandings about the role of women in the early church and examines this passage in the light of the rest of the New Testament teachings of gender roles. He suggests the following:
Scripture must be viewed and considered as a whole and within a context. Using any single Scripture to cancel out the combined impact of many Scriptures is, to say it in the kindest way possible, not a safe way to handle God’s Word. Those who use 1 Timothy 2:12 as a prooftext to shut down women’s ministry are guilty of using one Scripture to cancel out the clear and compelling biblical revelation of women ministering in many other settings.
He comes to this conclusion based on some important insights:
Hesuchia means “quietness,” not “silence.” Further, in 1 Timothy 2:2 the stated goal is for all believers to live a “quiet” life. In 1 Thessalonians 4:11 Paul instructs all the brethren, “strive eagerly to be quiet, to do your own business and work with your own hands.” The apostle tells those believers who are not working “to work with quietness and to eat their own bread” (cf. 2 Thes. 3:12).
If our interpretation of this word has been “silence” and not “quietness” what mistakes may we have made in our application of this scripture?

Zens takes a scholarly approach to his book, citing authors, providing notes, sources, and helpful information in the appendixes. Yet this is a very readable book, concise (under 100 pages), and yet complete. Here is what he covers in his study.
1. How the New Testament...Views Women
2. Two Preliminary “Why’s?”
3. The Immediate Context of 1 Tim. 2
4. Why Paul Touches On Apparel In Prayer
5. Quietness, Learning and Submission
6. Post-Apostolic Mistreatment of Women
7. Is Paul Concerned About Women Teaching?
8. Why Note Adam Came First?
9. What About Eve’s Being Deceived?
10. The Gospel Applied to Cultural Situations
11. Conclusion & Summary
Having read several other books on this topic (having been in a denomination that was struggling with applying this exact issue) I am thankful to have this book as a resource. I wouldn’t hesitate to suggest it as a tool for a better understanding of Paul’s writing to Timothy and a fuller understanding of what the Bible has to say about women in ministry.

10 comments:

  1. Chad, this reminds me of a time in early 2004 when I was frustrated with the church that I was working at (yeah, you know the one) told me about their thoughts on women in ministry. Let's just say the Lord has more for me than they did.

    I immediately thought of that day and what went into my journal at that time.

    Peace,
    Carrie

    --

    I thank God every day
    that I'm free to pray
    out loud with the boys
    to make some NOISE
    and not be oppressed
    by the presence of breasts.

    Jesus the Man
    who made me like I am
    sets me free to preach
    his words on the streets
    from the pulpit, the speech
    he has put in my mouth
    is His for me to speak.

    Just because I bear children
    doesn't mean I don't fit in.
    I'm all about his will
    and THAT'S the real deal.
    I thank him each day
    for the part that I play
    as a WOMAN, a DAUGHTER, a TEACHER, a PREACHER
    a mouth for His voice
    and it was HIS choice...
    I'm thankful He made it
    so God wouldn't un-create it.

    My Savior, my King
    you mean EVERYTHING
    and I thank you
    my Lord.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Would you mind clarifying what the church you came from struggled with? I don't know where they stand on the issue. :) I've seen churches that don't allow women to do ANY teaching (even 2 year old Sunday School class) and churches that ordain women pastors.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Loren Cunningham's book "Why Not Women?" helped me understand this issue better almost ten years ago. He co-wrote it with someone whose name eludes me at the moment, but their premise is that the phrase "I do not permit A WOMAN to speak" was a polite way for Paul to call out the behavior of one woman without naming her. The church would have known who she was, so why pile on by naming her? Just another view of the possibilities.

    It just goes to show the cyclical propensity of man to keep coming back to the obvious need for grace. Thanks for blogging on this; it needs to be addressed desperately.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you for all that information. I am a woman preacher and teacher - and my Dad is a pastor of a church which believes that women should be silent in the church. It's good to see this subject being addressed and hopefully empower men and women to receive God's Word from his chosen vessels. :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Carrie, you know how much I enjoyed working with you, and I'm glad you are in a place to find more freedom in your expression. I sure loved your poem!

    Chris, thanks for your encouragement in writing about this. David Hamilton was the co-author with Loren on that book- he is also a YWAMer. Thanks for also bringing up this resource.

    Skipper, I'm so glad you took the time to comment on this article. It must be difficult to navigate this particular topic in your family. I'm glad it hasn't stopped you from pursuing what is on your heart. Hope you drop by here again!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hey Amy, heres a little bit of the background.

    For years Vineyard had been a men dominated movement having highlighted the theological standings of a couple of theologians who had complementarian viewpoints. Around 2004 the issue was raised as some felt this view was not in sync with other Kingdom values. There was a call made for leaders to write papers on the subject. If I remember correctly there were about 16 papers that were posted on the Vineyard website proposing both egalitarian and complementarian positions. After a time of study the Vineyard board made the following statement:

    "In response to the message of the Kingdom, the leadership of the Vineyard USA will encourage, train and empower women in all levels of leadership both local and translocal. The movement as a whole welcomes the participation of women in leadership in all areas of ministry."

    Although this was the decision of the national board, individual churches were told they had the freedom to implement it however they best saw fit. Though this was hoped to be acceptable to those with the traditional complementarian views, it didn't go over very well. Several churches left the Vineyard immediately. Others complained that an issue that was non-central to salvation was being made too important. Still others said this was a slippery slope of liberal views and would lead the Vineyard into more error.

    Although it was supposed to be a local issue, the reality of the decision is that not only can women be Pastor's in the Vineyard, now they can also hold regional and national positions, which means that women will hold positions over men. This was/is an issue for some, and another reason why some people jumped from the plane.

    So, as it stands now, the Vineyard movement is egalitarian, even though it still has many churches who are positionally and vocally opposed to it.

    I saw firsthand people walk out of a regional conference because the speaker was a woman. The shame of it was, she was by far the most memorable and impacting speaker that weekend.

    Now the Vineyard has a blog on their website for support for women in ministry.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "to simply crack open the pages of an English version of the Bible ..."

    You are right. Calling it "The Bible" [the book] may be part of the problem. If instead of saying "The New Testament" we called it "The 1st Century Record", maybe the burden of understanding the text would stand out more.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thanks for the recommendation. Do you know of any books that take this hermenutical stance on same sex partnerships?

    Dyfed.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I wonder if the problem is that we take Paul's writings for a specific time and a specific place within a specific cultural setting with Paul in a specific role and make them into a template for all people for all time. Surely the verses in this passage of 1 Timothy actually provide context when Paul prefaces just about everything with "I".

    "--> I <-- do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent."

    But perhaps the question that needs to be asked is what "WE" want for the conditions which exist today.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Tonight, my parents are being ordained as Pastors, which, if you ask anyone, is just another case in point of man acknowledging what God has already set in motion, for many many years.

    I appreciate my part of the Church's stance on Pastoral roles -- it's not about the man, or the woman, but their role together, as husband and wife. My father and mother are evenly yoked, from my perspective as their son, and I appreciate that the title "Pastor" is far less important than the function of pastoring -- which we all have a part to play in -- and that the title rests upon both husband and wife.

    I do think, for certain reasons, a Pastor, male or female, should be married and have a good sex life. (That's not meant to be a joke; I absolutely think a man or woman is incomplete as a Pastor without the other.)

    ReplyDelete